How far do you agree that the main reason that Henry VIII...

How far do you agree that the main reason that Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries in England between 1536 and 1539 was that they were corrupt? At the beginning of Henry VIII’s reign in 1509, there were over 800 monasteries in England, but by 1540 the majority of these ceased to exist and all that was left of most of them was a ruin. The monasteries were rich and powerful institutions which were loyal to the Pope. From 1536 to 1539, Henry VIII, and his advisor, Thomas Cromwell wanted to close down the monasteries. There were two real reasons why Henry VIII wanted to get rid of the monasteries, firstly because he wanted access to the wealth of the monastery and he wanted the treasures of the land owned by the Church. Secondly Henry VIII†¦show more content†¦Many monasteries still believed in Catholic ways and Henry didn’t want that, he wanted the Church to be Protestant. Source B tells us that even some Protestant people were convinced the monasteries still had Catholic ways, it says, â€Å"To convinced Protestants, the monasteries were a clear reminder of the survival of catholic ideals. One of their main functions was to pray for the souls of the dead- an act that was thought unnecessary by Protestants† This suggests that Protestants thought they were praying unnecessarily. Henry VIII also wanted to change the religion in the monasteries because some of the monks and nuns were behaving so badly it was embarrassing to henry VII. This is backed up by the evidence of Source G, an extract from the Act of the Dissolution of the Lesser [smaller] Monasteries, where it reports â€Å"Manifest sin, vicious, carnel and abominable living is daily used ad committed among the little and small abbeys, priories and other religious hoses of monks, canons and nuns, and causes great (embarrassment) to the King’s highness and the realm.† I do not believe the only reason that Henry VIII wanted to dissolve the monasteries in England between 1536 and 1539 was because they were corrupt. I think Henry VIII dissolved the monasteries because of his financial and religious motives, he needed more money so he used the wealth of the monasteries and he wanted everyone in the

The Emotions Of Creon In Antigone By Sophocles - 852 Words

Throughout the play Antigone by Sophocles, Antigone does not have one main motivation, but rather a blend of many. As Antigone’s three most evident motives are doing the right thing, flouting Creon’s authority, and expressing her overall anger at life, the first and the last are most important. In this play, the combination of Antigone’s emotions toward her grave past and her obligation to her brother, regarding the gods, fuses together to be the incentive for her actions, regardless of Creon. Challenging Creon is almost a side effect, a medium through which Antigone can achieve her goals. Antigone’s past is a messy one: an incestual and murderous curse put on her family, her mother’s suicide, her father’s self-mutilation and banishment,†¦show more content†¦Furthermore, in Antigone’s conversation with Ismene, she reveals more of her motivations. Antigone’s anger is carried over, but the reader is also introduced to a budding grief. She states that Creon â€Å"has no right to keep [her] from [her] own† (59). The fact that Polynices is her brother is enough to for Antigone to justify her actions against the law. The tone of this statement feels like a grief-stricken plea, to do what is right for her brother. She loves him, and he deserves to be buried. Antigone then mentions that Creon and everyone who refuses to bury Polynices is â€Å"dishonor[ing] the laws the gods hold in honor† (91-92). For Antigone to then act against everyone, would, therefore, be the right thing, in terms of religious beliefs. For someone other than Antigone this might be sufficient enough motivation, but since she is so complex it is only a factor. A thoughtful, rational person probably wouldn’t be so quick to jump into a decision that would inevitably lead them to their death, even if that decision was the right one. Since Antigone is so upset with her life, she doesn’t care if she lives or dies, if the past is any indication of her future, only more pain will come. This is what makes her do the right thing. Antigone believes burying her brother is right, and that the laws of the gods must be obeyed, so it is a factor, but since she actually takes action and buries him, she throws her life away.Show MoreRelatedAncient Greek Tragedies: Passion vs. Prudence 959 Words   |  4 Pagesis the catastrophe caused by acting on emotions. Both Oedipus and Antigone experience this as a result of their rash behavior. Even Creon ends up miserable in Antigone due to the change in his behavior. By acting on their e motions, these characters all experience tragic downfalls, while others, such as Ismene and Creon during Oedipus Rex, remain safe due to their prudence and indications of wisdom. Due to the actions she took based on her emotions, Antigone suffered a far worse fate than IsmeneRead MoreAntigone Character Analysis1422 Words   |  6 Pages Antigone, the final play in a series including Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, discusses the ideas of leadership, family, and choices. It features two central characters: Antigone, a girl who chooses to illegally bury her brother, and Creon, a king who decrees the burial of the brother to be illegal. Upon the first encounter of the text, it appears that Antigone is the â€Å"hero† of the play, but on further analysis, one realizes that the tragic hero, as defined by Aristotle, is actually Creon. The ideaRead MoreAntigone Catharsis Essay982 Words   |  4 Pagesaction to release self-pitying emotions. This process of relieving oneself from fear and pity into a sense of renewal and purification is known as catharsis. In the Greek play, Antigone, the author, Sophocles used catharsis to demonstrate situations in which the sense of renewal one is seeking for sometimes can only be reached through tragic ways. The play exhibits these violent ways through struggles and the ultimate aftereffect of three important characters. In Antigone, catharsis is reached by theRead MoreCreon : The Tragic Hero In SophoclesAntigone886 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"According to Aristotle, the function of tragedy is to arouse pity and fear in audience so that we may be purged or cleansed, of these unsettling emotions.† (â€Å"What is† 739) This â€Å"purging† is clearly effective in Sophocles’ Antigone which is about a young woman’s will to do what is right by the G ods. Also, according to Aristotle, â€Å"a tragedy can arouse twin emotions of pity and fear only if it presents a certain type of hero or heroine who is neither completely good nor completely bad† (â€Å"What is† 739). HeRead MoreIn â€Å"Impossible Mourning: Sophocles Reversal† By Fanny Soderback,1276 Words   |  6 Pages In â€Å"Impossible Mourning: Sophocles Reversal† by Fanny Soderback, she introduces the concept of a Sophoclean reversal at the heart Antigone. To introduce her argument, Antigone is associated with the private realm and divine law, and Creon is a representative of human law and politics. Soderback bases her understanding of Antigone on the work of Hannah Arendt, who argues that the Greek public realm is distinctly separated from the private realm, which rebuts most claims of how family and state wereRead MoreEssay about The Greek Gods Did Not Think Before They Acted1615 Words   |  7 Pagesoften root from a fatal flaw. By placing power on their emotions when making decisions, they are unable to come to terms with the repercussions at an early stage. When they finally step back and rationally understand situations it essentially is too late. In Sophocles’ play Antigone, the author follows the Aristotalean principles of a tragic heroine in contriving the character Antigone. One distinct component of a tragic hero that Antigone comprises of is that she comes from a noble family thatRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Sophocles Antigone1355 Words   |  6 Pagesperson thinks about the word suffering a lot of emotions and meanings can all flow in at once. It is a word that not many people want to talk about let alone feel it. However it is a truly amazing emotion; to suffer. That word can mean so many different things to so many different people. It is up to that one person to make a choice and define that word for themselves. The reason as to why one must define the word themselves is because it is a personal emotion. One person cannot tell another that theyRead MoreEssay on Creon as the Tragic Hero in Sophocles Antigone1326 Words   |  6 PagesCreon as the Tragic Hero in Antigone     Ã‚   This essay will compare two of the characters in â€Å"Antigone†, Antigone and Creon, in an effort to determine the identity of the tragic hero in this tale.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   To identify the tragic hero in Sophocles’ renowned play â€Å"Antigone†, we should first consider both the elements present in Greek tragedies and what characteristics define a tragic hero. Aristotle’s definition of tragedy is: â€Å"Tragedy is a story taking the hero from happiness to miseryRead MorePathos In Antigone978 Words   |  4 PagesAntigone and Aristotle’s definition of tragedy The beauty of tragedy is its ability to capture the audience and evoke a particular emotion in it. Tragedy, as Aristotle defines it, â€Å"accomplish[es] by means of pity and fear the cleansing [katharsis] of these states of feeling† (Poetics 1449b 27-28). Aristotle claims that tragedy offers some certain value for the audience – a social and psychological value – through the empathy it sets in place for the audience. Sophocles’ tragic play, Antigone, isRead MoreSympathy for the Main Character in Sophocles Antigone Essay794 Words   |  4 PagesSympathy for the Main Character in Sophocles Antigone Sophocles play is named after its main character, Antigone, and for one the first times in Greek Tragedy it is a woman. In this play, Antigone is clearly the protagonist, as she is showed in her grief, seems sympathetic and the reader or spectator sees her from the beginning; it creates more impact and draws attention to the extremity

Index To Business Communication Quarterly Business Communication

Question: Discuss about the Index To Business Communication Quarterly for Business Communication? Answer: 1) is this written in direct order or indirect order. The given letter is an official letter which is written in the direct order. In this letter all the information regarding the accidental benefit of the employee of a company are written by the HR personnel in very simple way. All the information about the accidental benefit is said in direct approach('Index to Business Communication Quarterly', 2006). 2) is the choice of order appropriate? Discuss why or why not. The given letter is written by the HR manager to its employee to inform them about the meeting where the new employee benefit. This letter should be in official format. But some part of this letter was written in unofficial format, which should not be done. Therefore it can be said that in some part like introduction part was written in the appropriate order but the other part is written in unofficial manner which is wrong('Index to BUSINESS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY', 2005). 3.) Writers objectives in this letter The writer of the given letter is HR manager. The main objectives of the HR manager are as follows- 1) To inform the employee about the meeting conducted by the company to announce the new employee benefits. 2) To inform the employee about the new accidental benefit provided by the company to its employee. 3) To provide a brief information about the benefit of this accidental indemnity insurance plan. 4) To give the information that a representative will present in the meeting to answer the query of the employee regarding employment benefit. 4. Rewrite the document to improve it Two portions in the letter given were written in wrong approach. It should be in the following way, The first portion is The employees are asked to follow this link to learn about the meeting dates, locations and registration producers and the second portion is The employees are requested to learn more at informational meetings. 1) is this written using the direct order or the indirect order? The given letter is an unofficial letter about the insurance payment to replace the damage kitchen cabinet which was sent to a customer by an insurance company. The whole letter was written in the indirect approach. Therefore It can be said that the letter is written using the indirect order('Index to BUSINESS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY', 2005). 2) Do you agree with the choice of order? This letter is a response letter by an insurance company to its customer. It should be written in indirect approach. Since this letter was written in indirect approach therefore I am completely agree with the choice of order('Journal of Business Communication', 2005). 3) What is the very most important point of fact delivered in this document? The important point of fact delivered in this document are- 1) After the conversation with the customer the insurance company has agreed to pay $2,900 to replace the damage kitchen cabinet. 2) The old kitchen cabinet value is lower than new kitchen cabinet. 3) Both the customer and the manager of Millers Home surplus have ensured that the payment provided by the insurance company is adequate for the replacement of kitchen cabinet. 4) The customer also has agreed that if he will select any better kitchen cabinet of higher value that what the insurance company is ready to pay then the customer will pay the difference. 4) Point out anything that you would revise in this document? The information provided in the letter is sufficient. Therefore I will not want to revise the document. 5) Assign a letter grade to this document: A,A=,B+,B,B-,C+,C,C-,D+,D,D-,F? The letter grade for the given letter is C+. References Index To Business Communication Quarterly. (2006).Business Communication Quarterly,69(1), 103-110. doi:10.1177/1080569906286449 Index to BUSINESS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY. (2005).Business Communication Quarterly,68(1), 109-119. doi:10.1177/108056990506800115 Index to BUSINESS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY. (2005).Business Communication Quarterly,68(1), 109-119. doi:10.1177/108056990506800115 Journal of Business Communication. (2005).Journal Of Business Communication,42(2), 109-109. doi:10.1177/002194360504200202

The Death Penalty - A Necessary Evil Essays -

The Death Penalty - A Necessary Evil The Death Penalty: a Necessary Evil Life is the most wonderful gift that God gives us. He also gives us the power to do what we wish with that life. We can keep it and guard it, or we can take it away. It follows that murder is the worst crime anyone could ever commit. It is a crime that no one can ever make right because once you take a life away you can never give it back. Penalties exacted from criminals are made to fit the crimes committed. The worst crime possible should therefore receive the worst penalty possible. That penalty is the death penalty. Take, for example, the case of a man who is caught shoplifting. He does not deserve the same punishment as someone who is convicted of assault and battery. Most people would have no problem agreeing with this. Yet many of these same people believe that a cold blooded killer deserves the same life sentence as a convicted kidnapper who did not kill his prisoner. Granted these are both serious offenses, but our system of law works by degrees of seriousness (Bedau, p.326). The mental damage done to that prisoner can be turned around, but the life taken away by the murderer can never be given back. They should therefore be given a harsher punishment than life in prison. In terms of justice, we should all get what we deserve. One argument against the death penalty is that the bible tells us not to murder. If this includes all people it should include the government. However, the death penalty is not quite the same as murder. It is an exacting of justice. Consequently, the Bible also says, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. It could also say a life for a life as well. The government also has rights that we as citizens do not have. As Mayor Ed Koch says in his essay on the death penalty, the execution of a lawfully condemned killer is no more an act of murder than is legal imprisonment an act of kidnapping. (Bedau, p.318) People who are convicted of murder more often than not have more crimes than just that one murder under their belt. Their mental state allows them to commit horrible acts and not feel guilty about them (Bedau, p.322). There is not much proof than anyone can change this mind set. Say, for instance, that one of these said murderers is charged with life in prison. In jail they make the effort to have a good behavior. Within twelve years they are out on the streets only to kill again. Or maybe even worse, someone has been charged with multiple life sentences and there is no possible way to get out of prison. Because this is the worse punishment they can have they are in effect given a license to kill whomever they can get their hands on in prison. The death penalty needs to be around as an option for those cases in which the criminally is likely to kill again if ever given the chance. The death penalty also has the potential to become a very powerful deterrent against acts of murder (Grabowski, p 257). Life in prison is almost better than some of the lives that these criminals lead. At least they are fed and kept out of the rain. Death, however, is a real punishment no matter how you look at it. And even if someone wanted to die, there are easier ways of doing that than being put on death row. The problem is that not enough of these executions occur to be of any real use as a deterrent. In fact, there was one year in which more people were executed in Florida than in any other state and there homicide rate went up while in the rest of America it went down (Pojman, p.319). Obviously with the numbers of executions actually taking place (in Florida it was eight people), they can not do much to stop people from killing. The chance of them getting the death penalty is far too unlikely. There is finally the problem of innocent people