Reviewers Questions on the Thesis - 560 Words

1. Reviewer question: What is the authors thesis? The authors thesis is that Benedict Arnold is unfairly reviled as a traitor without recognition of his heroic efforts and achievements in the Revolutionary War. 2. Reviewer question: Is the thesis clearly stated? If not, how would you help the writer restate it? The thesis is fairly clearly stated, however it would be made more clear without the degree of supporting detail included in the thesis statement itself. Perhaps listing these details and then supplying a separate thesis statement would be better? 3. Reviewer question: Does the essays body stick to the main topic? If not, where does it digress, and how could the writer revise the paper to make it stay more on the main topic? There is no significant deviation from the main topic of the paper in the body paragraphs, yet they do not directly correspond the supporting details of the thesis statement nor are clear references to the thesis included in the body of the paper. At times, certain details appear to be disconnected form the main topic, at least initially; making sure that every piece of information clearly and directly supports the argument of the thesis would make the body somewhat more cohesive and on-point. 4. Reviewer question: Does the paper contain any ambiguously-worded or confusing sentences? Please list them below and offer a suggested revision for each one you identify. The first sentence is too wordy, confusing, and is ultimately incorrectShow MoreRelatedBeing A Foreigner Speaking English As A Second Language1040 Words   |  5 Pagesbut also pros of how I’ve put effort as an overall. From the peer review sheet filled out by one of the student from the English class, it also gave clarity of what to bring things together to make the writing become much in clarity. Such when the question was asking about the weakness of the overall essay, the evaluator commented about the grammatical errors and the lack of fluent transitions between sentences and paragraphs. From these feedbacks, I was then able to make clarification of what changesRead MoreExamples of Book Review9130 Words   |  37 Pagesthat the reader pointed out what appealed to her. _______________ An author is allowed to extract excerpts from total information received in a review. I get permission to do this first, but it is not necessary as long as you do not change the reviewer’s opinion. The rule is: Once the reviewer sends an author their book review comments, they become property of the author, to do with, as they will. They may correct misspellings, change punctuation, or incorrect word usage, but should never changeRead MoreLiterature Review8362 Words   |  34 Pagesliterature review is flawed, the remainder of the dissertation may also be viewed as flawed, because â€Å"a researcher cannot perform significant research without first understanding the literature in the field† (Boote Beile, 2005, p. 3). Experienced thesis examiners know this. In a study of the practices of Australian dissertation examiners, Mullins and Kiley (2002) found that, Examiners typically started reviewing a dissertation with the expectation that it would pass; but a poorly conceptualized orRead MoreProfessional Skepticism and Auditors Workpaper4359 Words   |  18 Pagesefficiency and effectiveness gains that could result from specialization within the review process, significan t other influences, such as the degree of skepticism possessed by the reviewer, remain unexamined. This paper addresses one such influence: the reviewer’s professional skepticism. In addition to the due care requirement for auditors to be skeptical, Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 53 (AICPA 1988c), No. 57 (AICPA 1988b), No. 67 (AICPA 1992), and No. 82 (AICPA 1997a) reinforce the necessityRead MoreDeveloping Effective Research Proposals49428 Words   |  198 Pagesplan 2.6 Research questions or research problems? 2.7 A simplified model of research 2.8 Review concepts and questions Notes 3 A General Framework for Developing Proposals 3.1 An overall framework 3.2 A hierarchy of concepts 3.3 Research areas and topics 3.4 General and specific research questions viii ix x 1 1 3 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 19 19 21 22 23 24 25 previous page page_v next page Page vi 3.5 Data collection questions 3.6 Research questions and data – theRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 Pageseither traps for the unwary or success modes. Discussion Questions and Hands-On Exercises encourage and stimulate student involvement. A recent pedagogical feature is the Team Debate Exercise, in which formal issues and options can be debated for each case. New in some cases are Devil’s Advocate exercises in which students can argue against a proposed course of action to test its merits. A new pedagogical feature, based on a reviewer’s recommendation, appears at the end of the Analysis section: